Dr. Fauci Shut Down A Grandstanding Rand Paul (Again) In A Congressional Hearing

In the latest installment of “Dr. Fauci Does Not Have Time For Rand Paul’s B.S.,” the famed immunologist sparred with the Republican senator from Kentucky over the origins of COVID-19. (We’ll give you one guess as to who won.)

During a congressional hearing meant to assess the country’s response to the pandemic, Paul attacked Dr. Fauci’s credibility, trying to inadvertently place blame for the pandemic on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) while also entertaining some popular far-right conspiracy theories related to the virus. Paul claimed that Fauci and the NIH allotted grants that funded “gain of function” research that may have been responsible for the COVID-19 outbreak.

“Gain of function” research is a fairly controversial form of scientific study that basically increases the lethality and infectious nature of a pathogen so that scientists can study how it affects people and craft countermeasures against it. Recently, it was discovered that the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab near the site where the first coronavirus cases were reported, had been conducting “gain of function” research using bat-originated coronaviruses. This does not mean that the virus leaked from the lab — either accidentally or on purpose. Like pretty much every other outbreak in history, COVID-19 is probably the result of the virus being passed from animal-to-human contact. Still, the news that a Wuhan lab had been experimenting with coronaviruses before one of the deadliest pandemics in history shut down the world for over a year is a good enough thread for Paul to link COVID-19 to Dr. Fauci.

Paul accused Fauci of funding research into coronaviruses in China, asking him to comment on whether he still supported NIH funding of “gain of function” research in Wuhan and Fauci — as politely as he could while trying to educate the conspiracy-mongering permed-poodle — shut down whatever it is Paul was trying to pin on him.

“With all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect,” Fauci told Paul. “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” Fauci also clarified Paul’s misinformation on a grant the NIH did give to a group called EcoHealth Alliance, which did do research on the coronavirus in bats after the SARS outbreak in the early 2000s, though it was not “gain of function” research.

“Let me explain to you why that was done,” Fauci continued. “The SARS COV-1 originated in bats in China. It would have been irresponsible of us if we did not investigate the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been infected. If you look at the grant and if you look at the progress reports, it is not gain-of-function, despite the fact that people tweet that and write about it.”

While Paul was trying to stir up suspicion and distrust in government scientists who have been leading the charge to find an answer to this deadly virus, Fauci was transparent about his frustrations with the lack of transparency from China and the need to investigate the origins of the virus. So yes, we should all be thinking seriously about “gain of function” research and trying to figure out where COVID-19 came from so we can anticipate the next outbreak… but no one should be getting their facts from an ophthalmologist, who thinks mask-wearing is just a thing people do for dramatic effect and that herd immunity is equal to a 22% infection rate.

Source: https://uproxx.com/viral/anthony-fauci-shuts-down-rand-paul-congressional-hearing/

Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez Relationship Timeline — Walk Down Memory Lane

From 2005 until somewhere in late 2020 or early 2021, it appeared as though Ben and Jennifer had little to no contact with one another. During that time, the stars led their own very separate and successful lives, both personally and publicly. Jennifer and Marc had two children, Maximilian and Emme, prior to their split in 2014. Ben and Jennifer Garner, who were wed in 2005, had three children: Seraphina, Violet, and Samuel. Their relationship ended in 2018. 

Most recently, J.Lo had been linked to Alex Rodriguez, with plans to marry constantly delayed due to the outbreak of COVID-19, as well as personal reasons. After some time, the couple finally decided to call it quits, saying they were better off as friends than lovers.

Not even a month later, Jennifer was spotted driving around with Ben and soon after, they were reportedly jetting off to Montana, per People. While this is a clear indicator that something is brewing romantically yet again between the two stars, only time will tell how their relationship develops under these new circumstances.

Source : https://www.distractify.com/p/ben-affleck-jennifer-lopez-relationship-timeline

Do The Voice Contestants Get Paid? Here’s How They Make Money

“Once you’re on the show for a while, you got money to go out and catering was really great,” Jessica Poland told ‘Cosmopolitan’.

Kori Williams - Author
Mafe singing on stage on Season 25 of 'The Voice'.
Source: NBC

Being on a reality or competition show is a huge commitment. In exchange for chasing dreams, fame, or both, contestants have to leave their lives behind for at least a few months while the shows are filming. For many, the time away and chance to change their whole lives is worth it. Contestants on The Voice know exactly what that’s like.

Article continues below advertisement

While that level of commitment is inspiring, eventually, the contestants all need to go back to some kind of life off-camera. But do they get paid for their time on the show? And if so, how much?

Do ‘The Voice’ contestants get paid?

Chance the Rapper sitting in a judge chair on Season 25 of 'The Voice'.
Source: NBC

Aside from that $100,000 cash prize at the end of it all, contestants on The Voice do receive money from the show. But they don’t get paid in the same way that the coaches of the show or staff get paid. According to Newsweek, they do get a stipend, not a paycheck. Although it’s unclear just how much that stipend is.

Article continues below advertisement

Apparently, this stipend is only meant to cover their living expenses during their time on The Voice. Once they get eliminated from the show, they have to pack up and head back home right away. So, the show is probably doing everything it can to not spend more money than it needs to on contestants.

The Voice may give contestants a stipend, but they apparently don’t get the money until you’re on the show for some time. “It was basically like being an adult without having to be one,” Jessica Poland (aka Charlotte Sometimes) told Cosmopolitan. “Once you’re on the show for a while, you got money [a stipend] to go out and catering was really great. I ate really well.”

Article continues below advertisement

Can contestants make money outside of ‘The Voice’?

Even though The Voice doesn’t give its contestants a paycheck, that doesn’t mean that people aren’t allowed to make any money at all. Jessica also said that she sublet her NYC apartment while she was on the show in L.A. But that was the only way she was able to make any money considering that the show took up so much of her time. 

Article continues below advertisement

“I couldn’t make a ton of money,” Jessica continued. “And even though I worked as a film writer and played shows, I couldn’t do that while I was on The Voice. I couldn’t really work. No one can work.”

On the bright side, there was a lot of food available for contestants. Vicci Martinez from Season 1 told Cosmo that there was Starbucks available to them all day and that she even gained weight on the show.

Making money as a contestant on The Voice is pretty much worlds away from being a coach. We already know they get paid a lot for their roles. John Legend, for example, reportedly makes $13 million per season, according to OK Magazine while Ariana Grande collected a whopping $20 to $25 million to join the show. Although not all of the coaches make the same amount, it’s always a lot of money. The story’s a little different when you’re a contestant, though.

Source: https://www.distractify.com/p/do-the-voice-contestants-get-paid

Billie Eilish Explains How A Fan Convinced Her To Go Blonde

The obsession with Billie Eilish’s newly blonde hair continues. Since the singer revealed her platinum blonde look, fans have been wondering what exactly inspired the transformation. Eilish has no problem giving credit where credit is due, and she recently explained that a fan was what eventually convinced her to try out the new hairstyle.

Eilish appeared as the guest on The Ellen DeGeneres Show Monday where she spoke about her blonde locks. The singer said she came across a “fan edit” (presumably an image or video) in which they had edited her then neon green and black hair into a platinum blonde look:

“I’ve been wanting blonde for a while. I don’t know what came over me. I saw a fan edit when I had green hair, and it was like, me just with whatever hair color I had, and they just edited blonde hair on me, and I was like, ‘Ahhh! It’s so sick I want it!’ I kind of thought of it as a dream, I didn’t think it was going to happen because my hair’s been through so much, I thought it would burn it all off if I tried — but I did it.”

Elsewhere in the conversation, Eilish described how surreal it was to finally be able to watch her The World’s A Little Blurry documentary. The singer said it took a full six hours to watch it the first time because she kept pausing it to freak out. “It took us like six hours to get through it because we kept pausing it over and over and screaming and running around,” she said. “It was crazy because they were filming me for like three years and I had no idea what they got on camera and what they didn’t. I’m pretty much myself in front of a camera, I don’t really have a line. So I was pretty worried about what was going to be in there, but I love it.”

Watch Eilish’s full interview on Ellen above.

Source: https://uproxx.com/pop/billie-eilish-blonde-hair-convinced-by-fan-edit/

TikToker Catches Boyfriend Cheating Via Live Photo

A TikToker says she realized her boyfriend was probably cheating on her after he accidentally sent her a “live” photo with a surprising reveal.

Serena Kerrigan shared the unintentional video with her 283,000 followers alongside the caption “When the guy you’re dating says he misses you but then you click the live photo.” 

What was obviously supposed to be a still image starts out with nothing more than a hotel bed with a stuffed animal sitting up by the pillows. But the “live” feature unwittingly captured the few seconds that followed the snap—an unidentified woman falling into frame and onto the bed.

iPhone owners can turn on the live photo feature by hitting the series of circles near the flash button—and it’s easy to do by accident. If the button turns yellow, live is active, and when you try to take a picture, you’ll capture several moments after the still image.

Not everyone notices when the live feature gets turned on, and even fewer tend to notice when something in their camera roll was subjected to it. It isn’t surprising that a potential cheater was outed in such an awkward manner.

The TikTok also prompted viewers to desperately inquire about the follow-up conversation since the man presumably didn’t realize he’d given himself up.

“Please tell me you said ‘check the live video’ and then turned off your phone,” wrote @plaidpeacoat.

“He probably thought ‘glad I got the pic before she photobombed,’” @iconicolee joked.

Another TikToker pointed out that “you can save it to your camera roll and pull up the exact location,” suggesting Kerrigan could’ve gone and caught him even more red-handed.

Unfortunately for all the invested viewers, Kerrigan hasn’t posted an update about her relationship status. But she did take the time on Twitter to wish a “Happy Mother’s Day to all the women raising their boyfriends.”


Today’s top stories

*First Published: May 11, 2021, 1:58 pm CDT

Rachel Kiley

Rachel Kiley is a writer who sometimes writes things and sometimes is based in L.A., but is definitely always on Twitter @rachelkiley.

Source : https://www.dailydot.com/irl/tiktoker-boyfriend-cheating-live-photo/

Top 10 SNL Impressions Done in Front of the Actual Person

Top 10 SNL Impressions Done in Front of the Actual Person
It’s always awkward/hilarious when “SNL” impressions are done in front of the actual person. Our countdown includes Cheri Oteri as Judge Judy, Jim Breuer as Joe Pesci, Tina Fey as Sarah Palin, and more! Which “SNL” impression is YOUR favorite? Let us know in the comments!

Watch more great “SNL” videos here:
Top 10 Most Savage SNL Impressions – https://youtu.be/NeQ-MpGRxjU
Top 10 SNL Cast Members With The Best Impressions – https://youtu.be/skU6epTsvY8
Top 20 Funniest SNL Political Impressions – https://youtu.be/45GHLVxde_w

Have Your Idea Become A Video!
https://wmojo.com/suggest

Subscribe for more great content!
https://wmojo.com/watchmojo-subscribe

Visit WatchMojo Club for Great Deals!
https://wmojo.com/WatchMojoClub

Your trusted authority for Top 10 lists, reviews, tips and tricks, biographies, origins, and entertainment news on Film, TV, Video Games, Comics, Celeb, Music and Superheroes.

#SNL #SaturdayNightLive #WillFerrell

The Oakland A’s Will Look At Moving To A New City If Their Waterfront Ballpark Plans Aren’t Approved

The Athletics may follow the Raiders in moving from Oakland to Las Vegas as progress on their proposed new stadium site at Howard Terminal remains stalled.

On Tuesday, the team and Major League Baseball tried to apply pressure to Oakland city officials to approve their waterfront ballpark proposal by saying they will begin exploring relocation opportunities at the direction of the league, via ESPN’s Jeff Passan.

“The future success of the A’s depends on a new ballpark,” A’s owner John Fisher said in a statement. “Oakland is a great baseball town, and we will continue to pursue our waterfront ballpark project. We will also follow MLB’s direction to explore other markets.”

The A’s proposal to build a stadium at Howard Terminal called for the team to privately finance the $1 billion stadium, but did call for a significant investment of north of $850 million from the city for infrastructure around the stadium site, which the mayor’s office has pushed back on. As the stalemate continues between the city and the team with their lease at the Oakland Coliseum set to run up in 2024, Major League Baseball made clear that staying in the Coliseum site, both in its current form or in building a new stadium in the same location, is not something they are willing to let happen.

“The Oakland Coliseum site is not a viable option for the future vision of baseball. We have instructed the Athletics to begin to explore other markets while they continue to pursue a waterfront ballpark in Oakland. The Athletics need a new ballpark to remain competitive, so it is now in our best interest to also consider other markets.”

As Passan notes, the frontrunner for the A’s services is expected to be Las Vegas, where the Raiders recently moved and the city also added the Aces and Golden Knights in recent years to enter into the pro sports marketplace. Vegas’ success with those teams has made the city the most talked about relocation or expansion site for the sports leagues that don’t have a team there already, and so it is unsurprising MLB seems to be steering the A’s in that direction. Passan also points to two Canadian cities, Montreal and Vancouver, as possible destinations along with Nashville, Charlotte, and Portland, but Vegas seems like the most likely destination should Oakland not budge on approving the proposal.

Major League Baseball is clearly looking to strong-arm the city into approving the plan, shutting down alternatives like building a new stadium in the Coliseum site and making it public that the relocating efforts will begin. MLB is certainly aware that if the A’s were to leave it would be the third and final professional sports team to leave Oakland in less than a decade, as the Warriors moved from Oracle Arena to the Chase Center in San Francisco and the Raiders likewise left the Coliseum for the desert oasis of Las Vegas. As such, they may feel the city can be pushed into not losing all of their franchises, but on the other hand, the city has shown it won’t budge on this issue and isn’t afraid of teams walking.

Source: https://uproxx.com/sports/oakland-athletics-waterfront-ballpark-plans-howard-terminal-relocate-vegas/

Will Amy Roloff’s Wedding Be Televised? It’s a Big Deal for the Family

Whether or not Amy’s wedding is televised on Little People, Big World, Amy and Chris are open to the idea of her ex attending the wedding with his girlfriend as guests. Though right now, it could go either way.

In April 2020, Amy and Chris spoke to Us Weekly about inviting Matt and Caryn to their wedding, and while Chris said, “They’re welcome if they’d like to come,” Amy added that they wouldn’t want Matt and Caryn to attend their wedding out of obligation.

“I just don’t want to invite someone because we’re inviting them,” she said. “They would be invited, but I wouldn’t expect them to come because of what they expressed in the past. But the past is the past. Things can change in the future. We’ll see.”

Watch Little People, Big World on Tuesdays at 9 p.m. EST on TLC.

Source : https://www.distractify.com/p/will-amy-roloff-wedding-be-televised

Tom Cruise Opened Up About Growing ‘Very Emotional’ Over Jump-Starting ‘M:I 7’ Shooting Ahead Of His Leaked Rant

Back in December 2020, Tom Cruise went viral when he was secretly recorded tearing into crew members who were caught violating COVID restrictions on the set of Mission: Impossible 7. In a profanity-laced rant, the actor berated the crew who put the entire production into jeopardy after Cruise had jumped through significant hoops to get things back on track. That’s all after the pandemic threw the film industry into disarray as rolling shutdowns scuttled shoots and caused significant delays across the board.

Cruise opened up to Empire about finally getting M:I 7 back in front of the cameras. Yes, part of it was so that he could return to the increasingly death-defying stunts that he’s become famous for, but the actor definitely feels the responsibility of making sure his team still has work. Via Empire:

“All those emotions were going through my mind,” he says. “I was thinking about the people I work with, and my industry. And for the whole crew to know that we’d started rolling on a movie was just a huge relief. It was very emotional, I gotta tell you.”

Those emotions definitely came out during the recorded rant where Cruise went off about he expected everyone on his set to be the “gold standard” as Hollywood was watching the Mission: Impossible 7 production closely to guide the way.

“We are creating thousands of jobs, you motherf*ckers. I don’t ever want to see it again. Ever!” Cruise can be heard yelling. “You can tell it to the people who are losing their f*cking homes because our industry is shut down. It’s not going to put food on their table or pay for their college education. That’s what I sleep with every night – the future of this f*cking industry!”

While Cruise was praised for taking the COVID-19 rules seriously, he was not without his detractors. Former Scientologist Leah Remini claims the rant was staged for publicity. “Tom does not care about the families of his crew; this is all for publicity,” Remini told The Underground Bunker. “I mean, how anyone is falling for this is just mindblowing. I would bet that Tom had this rant written for him and had his Scientology assistant record and release it.”

(Via Empire)

Source: https://uproxx.com/movies/tom-cruise-mission-impossible-7-leaked-rant/