1- Mahmet Bodzag is trying to tell us women contribute morethan we read in the establishment of Ottoman Empire.
2- One of the reason why Dirilis Ertugrul is better than kurulus Osman is the methodology of the story and also the directives.
Kurulus osman concentrate on fictional characters, giving them the screen morethan the true characters.
– Alparslan film is better than osman in terms of the story narrative, little drama and suspense..
3- Ismaihan Sulatanat: Mahmet Bodzag is claiming to tell us that among those that causes obstacle to osman include women, while from the other angle he’s underrating the Seljuq empire showing the weakness of the sultan (making him powerless).
3- Bala and Malhun Hatunlar: They are completely dissolved in the Gaza system, mehmet bodzag showed us they didnt do any household aswell as upgrowing their children, infact he turn off all the sibling expect Alauddeen and Orhan.
4- Who is taking care of Osman siblings? Are they not intouch with their parent entirely or partially?
5-Infact he proved they (women) are those who reclaim Marmaracik castle, Subashi is just Idle in the reconquest.
I wonder if Ertugrul ever gave duty to Halime, neither selcan nor any other lady during his Gaza.
6- Women supposed to concentrate on home issues while supporting their husbands (Bamsi’s Hafsa Hatun, Halime, Ertugrul’s mother is an example).
You can remembered how Turgut (in Ertugrul) stopped Aslihan when she interrupted him in his leadership.
This post is not to underrate our loved sisters, but atleast let the story be semi-pure.
